±¹¹® ÃÊ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Àå¾ÖÀκ¹ÁöÇöÀåÀÇ ³íÀïÀû À̽´ÀÇ ÇϳªÀÎ ¡®Å»½Ã¼³°ú °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© ±×·ìȨÀÇ Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀ» ¾î¶»°Ô º¼ °ÍÀÎÁö¡¯¸¦ Ž»öÇϱâ À§ÇØ ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÇÙ½ÉÀûÀבּ¸Áú¹®Àº Á¾»çÀÚµéÀÌ ±×·ìȨÀ» ½Ã¼³ ¶Ç´Â Å»½Ã¼³·Î º¸´Â ÀÌÀ¯°¡ ¹«¾ùÀÎÁö? ±×¸®°í ½Ã¼³°ú Å»½Ã¼³Àû Ư¼ºÀº °¢°¢ ¹«¾ùÀ̰í, ½Ã¼³°ú Å»½Ã¼³ »çÀÌÀÇ È¥¶õÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å°´Â Ư¼ºÀÌ ¹«¾ùÀÎÁö¸¦ ±Ô¸íÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ °³¹æÇü Áú¹®...
[´õº¸±â]
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Àå¾ÖÀκ¹ÁöÇöÀåÀÇ ³íÀïÀû À̽´ÀÇ ÇϳªÀÎ ¡®Å»½Ã¼³°ú °ü·ÃÇÏ¿© ±×·ìȨÀÇ Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀ» ¾î¶»°Ô º¼ °ÍÀÎÁö¡¯¸¦ Ž»öÇϱâ À§ÇØ ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÇÙ½ÉÀûÀבּ¸Áú¹®Àº Á¾»çÀÚµéÀÌ ±×·ìȨÀ» ½Ã¼³ ¶Ç´Â Å»½Ã¼³·Î º¸´Â ÀÌÀ¯°¡ ¹«¾ùÀÎÁö? ±×¸®°í ½Ã¼³°ú Å»½Ã¼³Àû Ư¼ºÀº °¢°¢ ¹«¾ùÀ̰í, ½Ã¼³°ú Å»½Ã¼³ »çÀÌÀÇ È¥¶õÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å°´Â Ư¼ºÀÌ ¹«¾ùÀÎÁö¸¦ ±Ô¸íÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ °³¹æÇü Áú¹®Áö¸¦ Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼öÁýµÈ ±×·ìȨ Á¾»çÀÚ 58ÀÎÀÇ ÀǰßÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú 35ÀÎÀº ½Ã¼³, 23ÀÎÀº Å»½Ã¼³·Î º¸°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ½Ã¼³·Î º¸´Â ÀÌÀ¯´Â 15°³·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, Á¦µµÀû ÇѰè, ±â°üÀÇ ¿î¿µ¹æ½Ä, °ü·ÃÁÖüµéÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä ÀÌ»ó 3°³·Î ¹üÁÖȵǾú´Ù. Å»½Ã¼³·Î º¸´Â ÀÌÀ¯´Â 8°³·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, Á¦µµÀû °Á¡, ¼ºñ½º ¹æ½Ä, Á¾»çÀÚÀÇ Å»½Ã¼³°ú ±×·ìȨÀÇ °ü·Ã¼º Àνġ¯ ÀÌ»ó 3°³·Î ¹üÁÖȵǾú´Ù. µÎ °³ÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú ½Ã¼³Àû Ư¼ºÀº ¡®ÈƷðúº¸È£Áß½ÉÀÇ ¿î¿µ¸ñÀû, 1:4ÀÇ ¿¾ÇÇÑ Áö¿øÃ¼°è, °øµ¿»ýȰ°ú Á¾»çÀÚ µ¿°Å·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÀÚÀ²¼º°ú ÁÖµµ¼º Ä§ÇØ, ÀÔÁÖ¼±ÅÃ±Ç ºñ(Þª)º¸Àå¿¡ µû¸¥ Àå±âÀÔÁÖ, ´ë±Ô¸ð½Ã¼³°ú µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ÇàÁ¤°ü¸®¿Í Æò°¡Ã¼°è ¹× ¿¹»êÁö±Þ¹æ½Ä, ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ¿Í °ü·ÃÀÚµéÀÌ ÁýÀ¸·Î ÀνÄÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ½¡¯ ÀÌ»ó 6°³·Î ¾ÐÃàµÇ¾ú´Ù. Å»½Ã¼³Àû Ư¼ºÀº ¡®°¡Á¤°ú °°Àº ȯ°æ, Áö¿ª»çȸ¿¡¼ÀÇ »î, ÀÌ¿ëÀÚ°¡ ÀϹݼö±ÞÀÚÀÓ¡¯ ÀÌ»ó 3°¡Áö·Î ¾ÐÃàµÇ¾ú
´Ù. ½Ã¼³°ú Å»½Ã¼³ »çÀÌ¿¡¼ È¥¶õÀ» ÀÏÀ¸Å°´Â Ư¼ºÀº ¡®ÇàÁ¤°ü¸®Ã¼°èÀÇ ºñÀϰü¼º, ¿î¿µ±â°üÀÇ Ã¶Çаú ¿î¿µ¹æ½Ä, ÀνÄÁÖüÀÇ Å»½Ã¼³ °³³ä¡¯ 3°¡Áö·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
[´Ý±â]
¿µ¹® ÃÊ·Ï
This research has been executed to explore the issue of ¡®how to understand the identity of the group home in relation with the deinstitutionalization¡¯ which is causing controversy at welfare field of ...
[´õº¸±â]
This research has been executed to explore the issue of ¡®how to understand the identity of the group home in relation with the deinstitutionalization¡¯ which is causing controversy at welfare field of person with disabilities. The main questions of the research have been ¡®What is the reason that worker regard group home as deinstitutionalization?¡¯, ¡®What is the characteristics of the institution and deinstitutionalization respectively?¡¯ and ¡®What are the specific characteristics which cause group home¡¯s identity confusion between the institution and the deinstitutionalization?¡¯ To find the answers for these questions, I analysed 58 group home workers¡¯ answers by the open questionnaire. The result was that 35 workers regarded them as institution, 23 workers regarded them as deinstitutionalization. There found to be 15 reasons why they regard them as institution, which could be categorized into 1. innate limitation of the political system, 2. operational way of the group home 3. people¡¯ conception on deinstitutionalisation. There found to be 8 reasons why they regard them as deinstitutionalization, which could be categorized into 1. the system¡¯s merit itself, 2. different way of service, 3. workers¡¯ understandings of group homes¡¯ relation with deinstitutionalization. By comparison of two analysis results, the characteristics of the institution has been focused into: ¡®1. training/protection oriented operation. 2. 1:4ÀÇ lousy support system, 3. infringement of self-regulation and initiative by communal life and living together with worker, 4. long-term living because of no choice, 5. the same management and estimation system and budget supply, 6. the fact that the users and related people don¡¯t regard it as home.¡¯ The characteristics of the deinstitutionalization has been focused into: ¡®1. homely environment, 2. living in the community, 3. the users are general beneficinary. The characteristics that caused identity confusion between the institution and deinstitutionalization was 1. inconsistency in administry manegement system 2. philosophy and the way the operating agency is run, 3. persons¡¯ understandings of deinstitutionalization
[´Ý±â]
¸ñÂ÷
1. ¼·Ð
2. ÀÌ·ÐÀû ¹è°æ
3. ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý
4. ¿¬±¸°á°ú ºÐ¼®
5. °á·Ð ¹× Á¦¾ð