±¹¹® ÃÊ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¹Ì¼ú°ü¿¡¼ µµ½¼Æ® ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÌ °ü¶÷°´¿¡°Ô ¾î¶°ÇÑ °æÇèÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´ÂÁö Áö¿À¸£±âÀÇ Çö»óÇÐÀû ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¾Ë¾Æº¸´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. Á÷Á¢ °æÇèÇÑ ÀûÀÌ ÀÖ´Â 6¸íÀÇ °ü¶÷ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½ÉÃþ ÀÎÅͺ並 ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú, ÃÑ 6°³ÀÇ ¹üÁÖ¿Í 21°³ÀÇ ÇÏÀ§¹üÁÖ·Î ³ª´©¾îÁ³À¸¸ç ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. ù°, ¿¬±¸ ´ë»óÀÚ°¡ µµ½¼Æ® ÇÁ·Î±×·¥¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÏ°Ô µÈ °ÍÀº Áö½Ä...
[´õº¸±â]
º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¹Ì¼ú°ü¿¡¼ µµ½¼Æ® ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÌ °ü¶÷°´¿¡°Ô ¾î¶°ÇÑ °æÇèÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´ÂÁö Áö¿À¸£±âÀÇ Çö»óÇÐÀû ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¾Ë¾Æº¸´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. Á÷Á¢ °æÇèÇÑ ÀûÀÌ ÀÖ´Â 6¸íÀÇ °ü¶÷ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½ÉÃþ ÀÎÅͺ並 ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú, ÃÑ 6°³ÀÇ ¹üÁÖ¿Í 21°³ÀÇ ÇÏÀ§¹üÁÖ·Î ³ª´©¾îÁ³À¸¸ç ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. ù°, ¿¬±¸ ´ë»óÀÚ°¡ µµ½¼Æ® ÇÁ·Î±×·¥¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÏ°Ô µÈ °ÍÀº Áö½ÄÁ¤º¸½Àµæ, ¿ì¿¬¼º, µ¿ÇàÀÚÀÇ À¯µµ, ½À°ü¼º µîÀÇ ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇÑ °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù. µÑ°, µµ½¼Æ® ¾È³»¿¡ Âü¿©ÇÏ¸é¼ Á÷Á¢ ´À³¢°Ô µÈ °æÇèÀ» º¸¸é, µµ½¼Æ®·Î ÀÎÇØ Àû±ØÀûÀÎ Àü½Ã °ü¶÷À» ÇÏ°Ô µÇ°í ±³À°ÀûÀÎ È¿°ú¸¦ ´À³¢¸ç, Èï¹Ì°¡ »ý±â°í È£±â½ÉÀÌ »ý±â°Ô µÇ´Â °ÍÀ» ´À²¼´Ù. ¼Â°, µµ½¼Æ® ¾È³» Âü¿© ÈÄÀÇ ¹ÝÀÀÀ» º¸¸é, ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâ ¿Ü¿¡µµ µµ½¼Æ®ÀÇ Àд µíÇÑ ¼³¸í, ¸¶ÀÌÅ© ½Ã¼³ÀÇ ¹®Á¦ µî ºÎÁ¤ÀûÀÎ °æÇèÀ» ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇØ¼, µµ½¼Æ® ¾È³»°¡ Àü½Ã °ü¶÷¿¡ µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù°í ÀνÄÇÏ¸ç ±àÁ¤ÀûÀÎ ¹ÝÀÀÀ» °æÇèÇÑ °ü¶÷°´µéÀÌ ¸¹´Ù´Â »ç½ÇÀ» È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ µµ½¼Æ®ÀÇ ÇØ¼³°ú ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀûÀÎ ºÎºÐ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡¿¡¼´Â ¹Ì¼ú°ü·Ã Àü°øÀÚ¿Í ºñÀü°øÀÚ »çÀÌÀÇ °ßÇØ Â÷À̰¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ È¦Æ®ÀÇ Ã¼Çè¼ÒºñÀÇ Æ²¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Âü¿©ÀÚµéÀÇ °æÇèÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú µµ½¼Æ® °æÇèÀÌ Á¾ÇÕÀûÀÎ ¼Òºñ ÇàÀ§¿´À½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
[´Ý±â]
¿µ¹® ÃÊ·Ï
The purpose of this study is to find out what kind of experience docent programs provide to visitors in museums by means of Giorgi¡¯s phenomenological method. In-depth interview was conducted with 6 vi...
[´õº¸±â]
The purpose of this study is to find out what kind of experience docent programs provide to visitors in museums by means of Giorgi¡¯s phenomenological method. In-depth interview was conducted with 6 visitors who had experienced firsthand. As a result of the coding based upon Giorgi¡¯s method, it was divided into 6 categories and 21 subcategories, and the following results were obtained. First, the reason that the subjects of the study participated in the docent program was due to factors such as information, coincidence, induction of companions, and habits. Second, from participating in the docent guide, they felt that the docent led them to actively visit the exhibition, get the educational effect, and generate interest and curiosity. Third, looking at the reaction after participating in the docent guide, in addition to the positive influence, the docent¡¯s reading-like explanation and the problem of the microphone facility were negative experiences. Through this study, it was confirmed that there were many visitors who recognized that the docent guide was helpful in viewing the exhibition and experienced positive reactions. In addition, in the evaluation of the commentary of docent, there was a difference of views between art-related majors and non-majors. In addition, as a result of analyzing the participants¡¯ experiences according to Holt¡¯s frame of experiential consumption, it was found that the docent experience was a comprehensive
[´Ý±â]
¸ñÂ÷
I. ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹è°æ ¹× ¸ñÀû
II. ÀÌ·ÐÀû ¹è°æ
III. ¿¬±¸¹®Á¦ ¹× ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý
IV. ¿¬±¸°á°ú ¹× ³íÀÇ
V. °á ·Ð
Âü°í¹®Çå