±¹¹® ÃÊ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ °æÇèÀÌ Çб³ÀûÀÀ°ú ¾î¶°ÇÑ °ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ ź·Â¼º ¸ðµ¨¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÏ¿© Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ ÇлýµéÀÇ Çб³ ÀûÀÀ °úÁ¤¿¡¼ Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ¿Í °³Àγ»Àû º¸È£¿äÀΰú ´ëÀοÜÀû º¸È£¿äÀÎ, ±×¸®°í ź·Â¼ºÀº Çб³Æø·ÂÇÇÇØ û¼Ò³âµéÀÇ Çб³ÀûÀÀ¿¡ ¾î¶² °úÁ¤À» °ÅÃÄ ¾î¶»°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Áö¸¦ »ìÆìº¸°í À̸¦ ÅëÇØ Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ û¼Ò³âµéÀÇ Çб³ÀûÀÀÇâ»óÀ» À§ÇÑ °³ÀÔ ½Ã...
[´õº¸±â]
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ °æÇèÀÌ Çб³ÀûÀÀ°ú ¾î¶°ÇÑ °ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ ź·Â¼º ¸ðµ¨¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÏ¿© Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ ÇлýµéÀÇ Çб³ ÀûÀÀ °úÁ¤¿¡¼ Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ¿Í °³Àγ»Àû º¸È£¿äÀΰú ´ëÀοÜÀû º¸È£¿äÀÎ, ±×¸®°í ź·Â¼ºÀº Çб³Æø·ÂÇÇÇØ û¼Ò³âµéÀÇ Çб³ÀûÀÀ¿¡ ¾î¶² °úÁ¤À» °ÅÃÄ ¾î¶»°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Áö¸¦ »ìÆìº¸°í À̸¦ ÅëÇØ Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ û¼Ò³âµéÀÇ Çб³ÀûÀÀÇâ»óÀ» À§ÇÑ °³ÀÔ ½Ã µµ¿òÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ ½ÇÁõÀûÀÎ Áö½ÄÀ» ¾ò°íÀÚ ÇÏ´Â ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ³´Ù.
<¿¬±¸¹®Á¦ 1> Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ °æÇèÀº û¼Ò³âÀÇ Çб³ÀûÀÀ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â°¡?
<¿¬±¸¹®Á¦ 2> Çб³Æø·Â°ú Çб³ÀûÀÀ°úÀÇ °ü°è¿¡¼ ź·Â¼ºÀº ¾î¶°ÇÑ °æ·Î·Î ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â°¡?
<¿¬±¸¹®Á¦ 3> ź·Â¼ºÀº Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ û¼Ò³âÀÇ Çб³ÀûÀÀÀ» ¸Å°³ÇÒ °ÍÀΰ¡?
Á¶»ç´Â ¾çÀû ¼³¹®Á¶»ç·Î ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´°í °á°úÀÇ ºÐ¼®¤ý°ËÁõ¿¡´Â 300¸íÀÇ ÀÚ·áÀÇ Åë°èºÐ¼®À» À§Çؼ´Â SPSS12.0 ProgramÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ±âÃÊÅë°èºÐ¼®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´°í, ¼³Á¤µÈ ±¸Á¶¸ðÇüÀÇ ÀûÇÕ¼ºÀ» °ËÁõÇϱâ À§ÇØ È®ÀÎÀû ¿äÀκм®°ú °æ·ÎºÐ¼®À» AMOS 7.0 ProgramÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿¬±¸¹®Á¦¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´äÀ» ¾ò±â À§ÇØ 3°³ÀÇ ¿¬±¸¹®Á¦¿Í 9°³ÀÇ °¡¼³À» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
Çб³Æø·ÂÀÌ °³Àγ»Àûº¸È£¿äÀΰú ´ëÀοÜÀûº¸È£¿äÀÎ ±×¸®°í ź·Â¼º¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í, ±Ã±ØÀûÀ¸·Î Çб³ÀûÀÀ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °æ·Î¸ðÇü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °æ·ÎºÐ¼® °á°ú °³ÀÎÀû ¿äÀÎ Áß ³»ÀûÅëÁ¦¼ÒÀç°¡ ź·Â¼º¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÃÆÀ¸¸ç, °¡Á¤È¯°æ¿äÀÎ, Çб³¿Í ±³»ç ¿äÀÎ, ¶Ç·¡Ä£±¸ ¿äÀÎ ¸ðµÎ ź·Â¼º¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÃļ ±× ¿äÀÎÀÇ Á¤µµ°¡ Ä¿Áú¼ö·Ï ź·Â¼ºÀÇ Á¤µµ°¡ Áõ°¡µÊÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ ÅëÇØ »çȸº¹Áö ½ÇõÇöÀå¿¡ ±â¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÔÀÇ´Â Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ û¼Ò³âµéÀ» Áö¿øÇϱâ À§Çؼ ù°, °³ÀÎÀûÀÎ Â÷¿ø¿¡¼´Â û¼Ò³âµéÀÇ Æ¯±â¿Í Èï¹Ì¸¦ °í·ÁÇÑ È°µ¿ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ È°¼ºÈ, µÑ°, ºÎ¸ðµéÀÇ ÀÚ³àµé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓÆÄ¿ö¸ÕÆ®, ºÎ¸ð±³À°ÀÇ ÇÊ¿ä, ¼Â°, ±³»çµéÀÇ º¸´Ù Àû±ØÀûÀÌ°í °³º°ÀûÀÎ °ü½É°ú ÁöÁö°¡ ¿ä±¸µÇ¸ç, À̸¦ À§Çؼ´Â Çб³»çȸº¹Áö»ç³ª, Àü¹®»çȸº¹Áö»ó´ã±³»ç¿Í °°Àº Àü¹® ÀηÂÀÇ È°¿ëÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù°í ÇϰڴÙ.
°á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î Çб³Æø·Â ÇÇÇØ °æÇè û¼Ò³â¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °³ÀÔÀº °Á¡Áß½ÉÀÇ Åº·Â¼º¿¡ ´õ ÃÊÁ¡À» µÎ¾î¾ß Çϸç, º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼ ¹ß°ßµÈ º¸È£¿äÀο¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ °³ÀÔÀü·«À» ±¸¼ºÇÒ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
[´Ý±â]
¿µ¹® ÃÊ·Ï
The study has investigated the relationship between school violence damage and students' adaptation to school based on flexibility model. The study researched how school violence damage, individual's ...
[´õº¸±â]
The study has investigated the relationship between school violence damage and students' adaptation to school based on flexibility model. The study researched how school violence damage, individual's internal protective factors, external protective factors and flexibility give effects to students' adaptation to school through which process. The purpose of this study is to get the empirical knowledge that can help damaged students adapt themselves to school when there is an intervention to help them through the process.
Do experiences of school violence influence on teenagers' adaptation to school?
Through what courses does flexibility influence on the relation of school violence and school adaptation?
Will flexibility work for damaged students' adaptation to school?
The investigation was done by quantitative survey. For the result analysis and verification, SPSS120 Program was used for basic statistical analysis to verify the result from the data of 300 students and AMOS 7.0 Program was used to analyze the confirmative factors and channel in order to verify the appropriateness of the established structure model. To get answers for the study subjects, 3 questions and 9 hypotheses were established.
The result of course analysis on the course model where school violence influences on individual's internal protective factor, external factor, flexibility and ultimately school adaptation revealed that internal control element out of individual factors influenced most on flexibility and all of other factors such as household environment, school and teacher factor, same age group factor influenced on flexibility significantly, meaning that the bigger is the factor, the bigger gets the level of flexibility.
The implications of such study results that can contribute to the workplace of social welfare to support the school violence-damaged students are as follows. First, as individual level, activities considering their talent and interest should be activated, Second, parents should learn how to impower their children. Third, teachers should more actively take interest in the school violence-damaged students and individually support them, for which social welfare workers or professional counselors should be alloted to schools.
In consequence, the interruption into the teenagers with experience of school violence should be focused more on strength-pointed flexibility. In the meantime, various strategies of interruption based on the protective factors discovered by this study should be established.
[´Ý±â]
¸ñÂ÷
±¹¹®ÃÊ·Ï
¥°. ¼·Ð
¥±. ÀÌ·ÐÀû ¹è°æ
¥². ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý
¥³. ºÐ¼®°á°ú
¥´. ³íÀÇ ¹× °á·Ð
Âü°í¹®Çå
ABSTRACT