±¹¹® ÃÊ·Ï
±Ù·¡ µé¾î ¹ß»ýÇÑ ¿ë»êÂü»ç¿Í ¸¶À»°øµ¿Ã¼ ¸¸µé±â »ç¾÷Àº ¼¿ïÀÇ ½Ã¹Î»çȸ¸¦ µÑ·¯½Ñ ±Ç·Â°ü°èÀÇ ¾ç¸é¼ºÀ» º¸¿©ÁØ´Ù. ÇÑÆí¿¡¼´Â ±¹°¡-½Ã¹Î»çȸÀÇ °ü°è°¡ ¾ï¾Ð-ÀúÇ×ÀÇ °ü°è·Î, ´Ù¸¥ ÇÑÆí¿¡¼´Â Çù·Â-Âü¿©ÀÇ °ü°è·Î ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ »ó¹ÝµÇ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³´Ù. ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¾ç¸é¼ºÀÇ ±Ù¿øÀ» ã±â À§ÇØ Áö³ 20¿© ³â°£ º¯ÈÇØ¿Â ½Ã¹Î»çȸÀÇ ÀúÇ×°ú ´ë¾ÈÀÇ °ø°£ ¹× ¿îµ¿ÀÇ º¯È¸¦ ±¹°¡-½ÃÀå-...
[´õº¸±â]
±Ù·¡ µé¾î ¹ß»ýÇÑ ¿ë»êÂü»ç¿Í ¸¶À»°øµ¿Ã¼ ¸¸µé±â »ç¾÷Àº ¼¿ïÀÇ ½Ã¹Î»çȸ¸¦ µÑ·¯½Ñ ±Ç·Â°ü°èÀÇ ¾ç¸é¼ºÀ» º¸¿©ÁØ´Ù. ÇÑÆí¿¡¼´Â ±¹°¡-½Ã¹Î»çȸÀÇ °ü°è°¡ ¾ï¾Ð-ÀúÇ×ÀÇ °ü°è·Î, ´Ù¸¥ ÇÑÆí¿¡¼´Â Çù·Â-Âü¿©ÀÇ °ü°è·Î ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ »ó¹ÝµÇ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³´Ù. ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¾ç¸é¼ºÀÇ ±Ù¿øÀ» ã±â À§ÇØ Áö³ 20¿© ³â°£ º¯ÈÇØ¿Â ½Ã¹Î»çȸÀÇ ÀúÇ×°ú ´ë¾ÈÀÇ °ø°£ ¹× ¿îµ¿ÀÇ º¯È¸¦ ±¹°¡-½ÃÀå-½Ã¹Î»çȸ »ï°¢°ü°è¶ó´Â ƲÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÑ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ¿ì¸®´Â ¹ÎÁÖÁÖÀÇÀÇ È®´ë¿Í ½ÅÀÚÀ¯ÁÖÀÇÀÇ È®»êÀ̶ó´Â ¸ð¼øÀû °è±â°¡ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ±¹°¡-½ÃÀå-½Ã¹Î»çȸÀÇ °ü°èÀÇ º¯È¸¦ ±ÔÁ¤Çؿ԰í, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¸ð¼øÀû °è±â°¡ ½Ã¹Î»çȸ¸¦ µÑ·¯½Ñ ±Ç·Â°ü°èÀÇ ¾ç¸é¼ºÀ» ÃÊ·¡Çϰí ÀÖÀ½À» ±Ô¸íÇÑ´Ù. ±×¸®°í ±¹°¡ÀÇ ±âȸÁÖÀÇÀû ÇàÅÂ, ¼¿ïÀÇ µµ½Ã»çȸ¿îµ¿ÀÇ Á¦µµÈ, Áö¹æÁ¤Ä¡Ã¼Á¦ÀÇ º¸¼ö¿Í Áøº¸ »çÀÌ¿¡¼ÀÇ µ¿¿ä, Âü¿©Àû¡¤ÀúÇ×Àû ¿îµ¿¹æ½ÄÀÇ °øÁ¸ µîÀÇ Çö»óÀº ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¸ð¼øÀû °è±âÀÇ »ê¹°ÀÓÀ» ¹àÇô³½´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¹ß°ßµé·ÎºÎÅÍ ¿ì¸®´Â ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀÇ ¿îµ¿¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÇõÀû Àǹ̸¦ µµÃâÇÑ´Ù.
[´Ý±â]
¿µ¹® ÃÊ·Ï
The recent ¡®Yongsan-tragedy¡¯ and Community Building Projects represent a duality of power relationship around civil society in Seoul. While the state-civil society relation is characterized by oppress...
[´õº¸±â]
The recent ¡®Yongsan-tragedy¡¯ and Community Building Projects represent a duality of power relationship around civil society in Seoul. While the state-civil society relation is characterized by oppression and opposition in the first case, it is characterized by cooperation and participation in the second. This study seeks the source of this duality by analyzing changes in space and movements for opposition and alternatives in Seoul over the past 20 years, using the triadic framework of the state-the market-civil society. We explain that expansion of democracy and neo-liberalism as counteracting forces affects the triadic relations, leading to the duality of power relation around civil society in Seoul. Opportunistic behaviors of the state and local regime, institutionalization of urban social movements, and coexistence of participatory and oppositionary movements are all outcomes of the two contradictory occasions. From these findings, we derive practical implications for citizens¡¯ movements in Seoul.
[´Ý±â]
¸ñÂ÷
1. ¼·Ð
2. ½Ã¹Î»çȸÀÇ È°µ¿°ø°£°ú º¯ÈÀÇ °è±âµé
3. ¹®¹ÎÁ¤ºÎ ÀÌÈÄ ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀÇ ÀúÇ×/´ë¾È¿îµ¿ ¾à»ç
4. ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀÇ ÀúÇ×/´ë¾È °ø°£ÀÇ º¯È ºÐ¼®
5. ¼¿ï½Ã¹ÎÀÇ ÀúÇ×/´ë¾È ¿îµ¿ÀÇ º¯È ºÐ¼®
6. °á·Ð
Abstract
Âü°í¹®Çå