±¹¹® ÃÊ·Ï
º»°í´Â ±¹¾îÀÇ ÇÑÀÚ°è ¾î±ÙÀ» ºñȰ¼º¾î±Ù, ¾àȰ¼º¾î±Ù, °È°¼º¾î±ÙÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ´Â ÇüÅ·ÐÀû ³íÀǰ¡ ÀÎÁöÀû Â÷¿ø¿¡¼µµ Ÿ´ç¼ºÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ ¾îÈÖÆÇ´Ü°úÁ¦¶ó´Â ½É¸®¾ð¾îÇÐÀû ½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ °ËÁõÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè °á°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Åë°èÀû °ËÁõ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ºñȰ¼º¾î±Ù ¡®È°-¡¯, ¡®-Çõ¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£Àº °¢°¢ ¡®È°µ¿¡¯, ¡®°³Çõ¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£º¸´Ù ±æ¾ú´Ù. ¾àȰ¼º¾î...
[´õº¸±â]
º»°í´Â ±¹¾îÀÇ ÇÑÀÚ°è ¾î±ÙÀ» ºñȰ¼º¾î±Ù, ¾àȰ¼º¾î±Ù, °È°¼º¾î±ÙÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ´Â ÇüÅ·ÐÀû ³íÀǰ¡ ÀÎÁöÀû Â÷¿ø¿¡¼µµ Ÿ´ç¼ºÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ ¾îÈÖÆÇ´Ü°úÁ¦¶ó´Â ½É¸®¾ð¾îÇÐÀû ½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ °ËÁõÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè °á°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Åë°èÀû °ËÁõ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ºñȰ¼º¾î±Ù ¡®È°-¡¯, ¡®-Çõ¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£Àº °¢°¢ ¡®È°µ¿¡¯, ¡®°³Çõ¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£º¸´Ù ±æ¾ú´Ù. ¾àȰ¼º¾î±ÙÀÇ °æ¿ì ¡®°¡-¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£Àº ¡®°¡°Ç¹°¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£°ú Â÷À̰¡ ¾øÁö¸¸, ¡®-ÀΡ¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£Àº ¡®Çѱ¹ÀΡ¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£º¸´Ù ±æ¾ú´Ù. °È°¼º¾î±ÙÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â ¡®°¡Àü-¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£Àº ¡®°¡Àü ¾÷ü¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£º¸´Ù ª¾ÒÁö¸¸, ¡®±¹Á¦-¡¯¿Í ¡®´ëºÏ-¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£Àº °¢°¢ ¡®±¹Á¦ »çȸ¡¯, ¡®´ëºÏ Á¤Ã¥¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀ½Ã°£°ú Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ½ÇÇè °á°ú¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ¼öÇàµÈ ¾îÈÖºÎÇÐÀû ÇØ¼®ÀÇ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ºñȰ¼º¾î±ÙÀº ¾îÈֺο¡ µ¶ÀÚÀû ¾îÈÖ Ç¥»óÀ» °¡ÁöÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù. ¾àȰ¼º¾î±ÙÀº ¾îÈֺο¡ µ¶ÀÚÀû ¾îÈÖ Ç¥»óÀ» °¡Áö´Â ºÎ·ù¿Í ±×·¸Áö ¾ÊÀº ºÎ·ù·Î ³ª´¶´Ù. °È°¼º¾î±ÙÀº ¸ðµÎ ¾îÈֺο¡ µ¶ÀÚÀû ¾îÈÖ Ç¥»óÀ» °¡Áö¸ç Á¦ÇÑÀû ÀÚ¸³¼ºÀ» ȹµæÇϸé Åë»çÀû ±¸¼º¿¡ Âü¿©Çϱ⵵ ÇÑ´Ù. ±¹¾îÀÇ ÇÑÀÚ°è ¾î±ÙÀ» ºñȰ¼º¾î±Ù, ¾àȰ¼º¾î±Ù, °È°¼º¾î±ÙÀ¸·Î ³ª´©´Â ºÐ·ù ü°è´Â ºÎºÐÀûÀ¸·Î ½É¸®ÇÐÀû ½ÇÇè °á°úÀÇ ÁöÁö¸¦ ¹Þ´Â´Ù.
[´Ý±â]
¿µ¹® ÃÊ·Ï
This thesis is dedicated to verifying whether the morphological argument which categorizes sino-Korean roots into deactivated roots, mid-activated roots, and full-activated roots is viable even in the...
[´õº¸±â]
This thesis is dedicated to verifying whether the morphological argument which categorizes sino-Korean roots into deactivated roots, mid-activated roots, and full-activated roots is viable even in the cognitive level through a psycho-linguistic experiment called lexical decision task. The response time to the deactivated roots ¡®HWAL-¡¯ and ¡®-HYEK¡¯ were each respectively longer than that of ¡®HWALTONG¡¯ and ¡®KAYHYEK¡¯. In the case of the mid-activated roots, the response time to ¡®KA-¡¯ did not differ from that of ¡®KAKENMWUL¡¯. However, the response time to ¡®-IN¡¯ was longer than that of ¡®HANKWUKIN¡¯. In the case of the full-activated roots, the response time to ¡®KACEN-¡¯ was shorter than that of ¡®KACEN EPCHEY¡¯, but the response time to ¡®KWUKCEY-¡¯ and ¡®TAYBWUK-¡¯ each respectively did not differ from that of ¡®KWUKCEY SAHOY¡¯ and ¡®TAYBWUK CENGCHAYK¡¯. The lexiconological analysis based on the result of the response time reveals that deactivated roots does not possess independent lexical symbol in the lexicon, and mid-activated roots are divided into roots that possess independent lexical symbol in the lexicon and those that do not. All full-activated roots possess independent lexical symbol in the lexicon, and, on the condition that it gains limited self-reliance, may constitute syntactic composition. The result of the psychological experiment advocates the classification system of categorizing sino-Korean roots into deactivated roots, mid-activated roots, and full-activated roots. Thus, the classification of sino-Korean roots based on its morphological properties is supported not only by the morphological argument of its technical validity but also by its psychological substantiality.
[´Ý±â]
¸ñÂ÷
1. ¼·Ð
2. ÇÑÀÚ°è ±¹¾î ¾î±ÙÀÇ ¹üÀ§¿Í ¾îÈÖÆÇ´Ü°úÁ¦
3. ºñȰ¼º¾î±Ù°ú ¾àȰ¼º¾î±ÙÀÇ ±¸ºÐ
4. °È°¼º¾î±ÙÀÇ µ¶ÀÚ¼º
5. °á·Ð
Âü°í³íÀú
¡´Ã·ºÎ 1¡µ ½ÇÇè ½ÃÇà ÀÚ±Ø ¸ñ·Ï