±¹¹® ÃÊ·Ï
À¯Ã¢¼º½Ç¾îÁõ°ú ¾ËÃ÷ÇÏÀ̸ӼºÄ¡¸Å ȯÀÚ´Â ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î Ç¥Çö´É·Â¿¡ ºñÇØ ÇöÀúÈ÷ ÀúÇÏµÈ ÀÌÇØ´É·Â Ư¡À» °øÀ¯ÇÑ´Ù. µÎ Àå¾Ö±ºÀÇ ÀÌÇØ´É·Â ÀúÇϰ¡ ¾ð¾î󸮰úÁ¤ÀÇ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ±âÀü¿¡¼ ºñ·ÔµÈ Ư¡ÀÎÁö, °¢ Àå¾Ö°¡ ƯÁ¤ÇÑ ¾ð¾îó¸® ´Ü°èÀÇ ¼Õ»ó¿¡ ±âÀÎÇÑ °ÍÀÎÁö¸¦ °íÂûÇϱâ À§ÇØ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ½É¼º¾îÈÖÁýÀÇ ±â´É Æò°¡¿¡ ¹Î°¨ÇÑ ¾îÈÖÆÇ´Ü°úÁ¦¿Í, ÀǹÌü°èÀÇ ¼Õ»ó¿©ºÎ¸¦ ¹àÈ÷±â À§ÇÑ Àǹ̺зù...
[´õº¸±â]
À¯Ã¢¼º½Ç¾îÁõ°ú ¾ËÃ÷ÇÏÀ̸ӼºÄ¡¸Å ȯÀÚ´Â ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î Ç¥Çö´É·Â¿¡ ºñÇØ ÇöÀúÈ÷ ÀúÇÏµÈ ÀÌÇØ´É·Â Ư¡À» °øÀ¯ÇÑ´Ù. µÎ Àå¾Ö±ºÀÇ ÀÌÇØ´É·Â ÀúÇϰ¡ ¾ð¾î󸮰úÁ¤ÀÇ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ±âÀü¿¡¼ ºñ·ÔµÈ Ư¡ÀÎÁö, °¢ Àå¾Ö°¡ ƯÁ¤ÇÑ ¾ð¾îó¸® ´Ü°èÀÇ ¼Õ»ó¿¡ ±âÀÎÇÑ °ÍÀÎÁö¸¦ °íÂûÇϱâ À§ÇØ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ½É¼º¾îÈÖÁýÀÇ ±â´É Æò°¡¿¡ ¹Î°¨ÇÑ ¾îÈÖÆÇ´Ü°úÁ¦¿Í, ÀǹÌü°èÀÇ ¼Õ»ó¿©ºÎ¸¦ ¹àÈ÷±â À§ÇÑ Àǹ̺зù°úÁ¦¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© µÎ Àå¾Ö±ºÀÇ ¼öÇà·Â ¹× ¿À·ù À¯ÇüÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ ´ë»óÀº À¯Ã¢¼º½Ç¾îÁõ ȯÀÚ 10¸í°ú ¾ËÃ÷ÇÏÀ̸ӼºÄ¡¸Å ȯÀÚ 10¸íÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, K-WAB °Ë»çÀÇ ¾Ë¾Æµè±â Á¡¼ö°¡ Æò±Õ ÀÌÇϷμ ÀÌÇØ´É·ÂÀÌ ÀúÇÏµÈ È¯ÀÚ·Î Á¦ÇÑÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú, ¾îÈÖÆÇ´Ü°úÁ¦ÀÇ ¼öÇà·Â¿¡ ÀÖ¾î À¯Ã¢¼º½Ç¾îÁõ°ú ¾ËÃ÷ÇÏÀ̸ӼºÄ¡¸Å Áý´Ü°£ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ¹Ý¸é Àǹ̺зù´É·Â¿¡¼ Ä¡¸Å ȯÀÚ±ºÀº ½Ç¾îÁõ ȯÀÚ±ºº¸´Ù À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³·Àº ¼öÇà·ÂÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°ú´Â ½Ç¾îÁõ ȯÀÚ°¡ ½É¼º¾îÈÖÁýÀ¸·ÎÀÇ Á¢±Ù°úÁ¤°ú ¾îÈÖ Á¤º¸¸¦ Ȱ¼ºÈÇÏ´Â ±â´É¿¡ ÁÖ¿ä ±âÀüÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ¹Ý¸é, Ä¡¸Å ȯÀÚ´Â ÀÇ¹Ì Ã¼°èÀÇ ¼Õ»ó ¹× ÀÇ¹Ì Á¤º¸ »ó½ÇÀ» ÁÖÀåÇÏ´Â ¼±Ç࿬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú¿Í ÀÏÄ¡ÇÑ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ µÎ Áý´ÜÀº Àǹ̺зù´É·Â¿¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿©, À¯Ã¢¼º½Ç¾îÁõ°ú ¾ËÃ÷ÇÏÀ̸ӼºÄ¡¸Å¸¦ º¸´Ù Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ÆÇº°ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °úÁ¦´Â Àǹ̺зù°úÁ¦ÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
[´Ý±â]
¿µ¹® ÃÊ·Ï
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the characteristics of language processing between the patients with fluent aphasics and with dementia of Alzheimer Type(AD). Ten fluent aphasics(9 ...
[´õº¸±â]
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the characteristics of language processing between the patients with fluent aphasics and with dementia of Alzheimer Type(AD). Ten fluent aphasics(9 Wernicke's and 1 transcortical sensory type) who were admin- istered K-WAB and ten AD who were administered K-MMSE participated in this study. All participating patients were selected by the auditory comprehension subtest scales of K-WAB. The tasks used in this study consisted of lexical decision task(LDT) presented auditorily and the semantic categorization task presented with pictures. The number of correct responses and error ratios on the subtypes of words were elicited and the results were analyzed by t-test. The results of the present study were as follows: (1) Both groups didn't show any significant differences in the numbers of correct responses of LDT, but the correct response performance of AD group was significantly lower than that of the fluent aphasics in semantic categorization task. (2) The analysis of error types on the two tasks indicates that the error ratios on artifact words of both groups was higher than the ratios on the words of living things and that the distinctively aphasic group showed wider gap between the error ratio on the words of living things and the ratio on artifact words than that of AD group. These results are consistent with the previous study, which insisted that aphasics have an important pathology in accessing mental lexicon and in activating semantic information, but that, on the other hand, they preserve the function of semantic system, and that AD group suffers from the loss of semantic system and semantic information. The present study seems to shed some light on the characteristics of language processing disorders and provide useful information for SLP to clinically identify the patient's pathology.
[´Ý±â]
¸ñÂ÷
I. ¼·Ð
II. ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý
III. ¿¬±¸°á°ú
IV. °á·Ð ¹× ³íÀÇ