±¹¹® ÃÊ·Ï
³ë»ç°ü°è´Â ³ëÁ¶ ´ë °æ¿µÀ̶ó´Â Á¶Á÷ÀûÀ̰í Áý´ÜÀû °ü°è¶ó´Â Á¡¿¡¼ º¼ ¶§ ³ëµ¿Á¶ÇÕ¿øÀÇ ³ëµ¿Á¶ÇÕÂü¿©´Â Áý´Ü½É¸®°üÁ¡¿¡¼ ¿¬±¸µÉ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº Â÷¿ø¿¡¼ º» ¿¬±¸´Â Áý´Ü½É¸®°üÁ¡¿¡¼ ³ëÁ¶Âü¿©¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» »ó´ëÀû ¹ÚÅ»°¨, »çȸÁ¤Ã¼¼º, Áý´ÜÈ¿´É°¨À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ±Ô¸íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¾Æ¿ï·¯ °¢°¢ÀÇ º¯Àε鿡 ´ëÇÑ ¼±Çà¿äÀεéÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ ¹à...
[´õº¸±â]
³ë»ç°ü°è´Â ³ëÁ¶ ´ë °æ¿µÀ̶ó´Â Á¶Á÷ÀûÀ̰í Áý´ÜÀû °ü°è¶ó´Â Á¡¿¡¼ º¼ ¶§ ³ëµ¿Á¶ÇÕ¿øÀÇ ³ëµ¿Á¶ÇÕÂü¿©´Â Áý´Ü½É¸®°üÁ¡¿¡¼ ¿¬±¸µÉ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº Â÷¿ø¿¡¼ º» ¿¬±¸´Â Áý´Ü½É¸®°üÁ¡¿¡¼ ³ëÁ¶Âü¿©¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» »ó´ëÀû ¹ÚÅ»°¨, »çȸÁ¤Ã¼¼º, Áý´ÜÈ¿´É°¨À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ±Ô¸íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¾Æ¿ï·¯ °¢°¢ÀÇ º¯Àε鿡 ´ëÇÑ ¼±Çà¿äÀεéÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ ¹àÈ÷°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÁõºÐ¼®À» À§ÇÏ¿© ³ëÁ¶°¡ Á¶Á÷µÈ 12°³ »ç¾÷ü¿¡ Á¾»çÇÏ´Â 770¸íÀÇ ±Ù·ÎÀÚµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ±× °¡¿îµ¥ ºñÁ¶ÇÕ¿øÀ» Á¦¿ÜÇÑ 501¸íÀÇ ¼³¹®°á°ú°¡ À¯È¿Ç¥º»À¸·Î Ȱ¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù.
½ÇÁõºÐ¼®°á°ú »çȸÁ¤Ã¼¼º, Áý´ÜÈ¿´É°¨Àº ³ëµ¿Á¶ÇÕÂü¿©¿¡ À¯ÀÇÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ ¹Ý¸é, »ó´ëÀû ¹ÚÅ»°¨ÀÇ È¿°ú´Â ÁöÁöµÇÁö ¸øÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¾Æ¿ï·¯ ÀÌµé ¿äÀε鿡 ´ëÇÑ ¼±Çຯ¼öµéÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, ³ëÁ¶¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »çȸÁ¤Ã¼¼º¿¡´Â ³ëÁ¶ÀÇ »çȸÈȰµ¿, ³ëÁ¶¸í¼º ±×¸®°í ³ëÁ¶¼º¿ø°£ÀÇ Áö°¢µÈ À¯»ç¼ºÀÌ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ³ëÁ¶¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áý´ÜÈ¿´É°¨ Çü¼º¿¡´Â ³ëÁ¶ÀÇ °ú°Å ¼º°ø°æÇè ¹× ´ë¸®ÇнÀÀÌ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸°á°ú¿¡ µû¸¦ °æ¿ì ³ëÁ¶Âü¿©¿¡´Â ±¸¼º¿øÀÇ Áý´ÜÂ÷¿øÀÇ ½É¸®Àû ¿äÀÎÀÌ Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù´Â Á¡À» ÀνÄÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¿¬±¸°á°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³íÀÇ ºÎºÐ¿¡¼ º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÀÇ¹Ì¿Í ½Ã»çÁ¡¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀ¸·Î ³íÀÇÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¾Æ¿ï·¯ º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ÇâÈÄ ¿¬±¸°úÁ¦¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
[´Ý±â]
¿µ¹® ÃÊ·Ï
From a group psychological perspective, this study examines the effects of union members¡¯ perceptions of relative deprivation, social identity and collective efficacy on the union¡¯s past a...
[´õº¸±â]
From a group psychological perspective, this study examines the effects of union members¡¯ perceptions of relative deprivation, social identity and collective efficacy on the union¡¯s past and present performance.
First, we hypothesized that the sense of relative deprivation union members have toward the employer is related to the union¡¯s negotiation power (i.e., internal status) and to the working conditions relative to those of a referent company (i.e., external status). In this regard, we further hypothesized that internal deservingness perception that union should have more negotiation power and external deservingness perception that pay and other working conditions should be improved are related to union members¡¯ sense of relative deprivation toward the employer.
Second, we hypothesized that social identity has to do with the degree of socialization, perceived union reputation and similarity among union members. Third, we hypothesized that collective efficacy is related to the experience of previous successful achievement of the union, successful achievement of other unions in similar industries, and union members¡¯ trust in union leaders. Finally, we hypothesized that union members¡¯ participation in union activity is related to relative deprivation, social identity and collective efficacy.
With a questionnaire developed for our purpose, we collected data from 501 members of 12 manufacturing firms in Korea to test our hypotheses. The measurement properties of each construct were assessed and several items were deleted on the basis of item-total correlation and factor analysis. Linear structural equation analyses (LISREL) were conducted to test the hypotheses and the model. The overall adequacy of fit was found to be acceptable.
The results showed that (1) external status, internal and external deservingness influenced union members¡¯ relative deprivation, (2) socialization, perceived reputation of union and similarity among themselves influenced union members¡¯ social identity toward union, and (3) experience of previous successes and social vicarious learning influenced union members¡¯ belief in collective efficacy of the union. The results also showed that union members¡¯ perceptions of social identity and collective efficacy is positively related to union members¡¯ union participation. However, the results failed to show the relationship between relative deprivation and union participation.
These results have implications for the employer and employee (union) as well. As to the employer, recognition of unions as an independent entity and efforts for improving labor relations are called for. As to the employee (union), strengthening social identity and belief in collective efficacy is the way to go. To this end, unions should promote more socialization, maintain good reputation, encourage a sense of belonging and publicize their successes and achievements. Results and limitations of the study are also discussed form a group psychological perspective.
[´Ý±â]
¸ñÂ÷
¡´ÃÊ·Ï¡µ
¥°. ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹è°æ ¹× ¸ñÀû
¥±. ÀÌ·ÐÀû ¹è°æ ¹× ¿¬±¸°¡¼³
¥². ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý
¥³. ºÐ¼®°á°ú ¹× ³íÀÇ
¥´. °á·Ð
Âü°í¹®Çå
ABSTRACT