±¹¹® ÃÊ·Ï
¿À´Ã³¯ Á¨´õ´Â ¸ðµç Çй®°ú ½Çõ´ã·ÐÀÇ Çٽɰ³³äÀÌ´Ù. Á¨´õ´ã·Ð¿¡¼´Â ºñ´Ü ¿©¼ºÀÇ ¾ï¾Ð°ú Â÷º°»Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Á¨´õ°ü°è¸¦ ÅëÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àΰ£°ü°è¿Í Á¸À縦 ¹®Á¦·Î Á¦±âÇÑ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ Á¨´õÀÇ »çȸÀû ±¸¼º°úÁ¤ÀÎ Á¨´õÈ(gendering)´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ±³À°ÀÇ ÁÖÁ¦ÀÌ´Ù. º» ³í¹®Àº Çѱ¹»çȸÀÇ ¹Ì·¡ÁöÇâÀûÀÎ ±³À°¿¬±¸ Á¤ÂøÀ» À§ÇØ ³²¼º¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¼º°ú¸¦ ¼ö¿ëÇÑ Á¨´õ ½Ã°¢¿¡¼...
[´õº¸±â]
¿À´Ã³¯ Á¨´õ´Â ¸ðµç Çй®°ú ½Çõ´ã·ÐÀÇ Çٽɰ³³äÀÌ´Ù. Á¨´õ´ã·Ð¿¡¼´Â ºñ´Ü ¿©¼ºÀÇ ¾ï¾Ð°ú Â÷º°»Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Á¨´õ°ü°è¸¦ ÅëÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àΰ£°ü°è¿Í Á¸À縦 ¹®Á¦·Î Á¦±âÇÑ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ Á¨´õÀÇ »çȸÀû ±¸¼º°úÁ¤ÀÎ Á¨´õÈ(gendering)´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ±³À°ÀÇ ÁÖÁ¦ÀÌ´Ù. º» ³í¹®Àº Çѱ¹»çȸÀÇ ¹Ì·¡ÁöÇâÀûÀÎ ±³À°¿¬±¸ Á¤ÂøÀ» À§ÇØ ³²¼º¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¼º°ú¸¦ ¼ö¿ëÇÑ Á¨´õ ½Ã°¢¿¡¼ÀÇ ±³À°´ã·ÐÀÇ ½Ãµµ¶ó°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ³²¼º¼ºÀÇ »çȸÀû ±¸¼º°úÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñÆÇÀû °íÂû, Çѱ¹ ƯÀ¯ÀÇ ¿ª»ç ¹× »çȸÀû ¹è°æ°ú Áö¹èÀû ³²¼º¼º ¼ºÂû¿¡¼ Ãâ¹ßÇÏ¿© ¿©±â¼ ³ª¿Â »çȸ°ü°è, Àΰ£°ü°è, ÀÚ¾Æ Á¤Ã¼¼º µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¹®Á¦Á¡µéÀ» µå·¯³Â´Ù. À¯±³ À̵¥¿Ã·Î±â¿¡ µû¸¥ °¡ºÎÀå ÀÜÀç¿Í ±º»çÁÖÀǸ¦ ºñ·ÔÇÑ ±ÇÀ§ÁÖÀÇ·Î ³²¼ºÀÇ »çȸÀû Á¸Àç°¡ ¿Ö°îµÇ¾ú°í, À߸øµÈ ³²¼ºÁ᫐ ¼º¹®È¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¤Ã¼¼ºÀÇ ºÎ½Ç µîÀ¸·Î »õ·Î¿î °¡Á·°ü°è³ª Á÷¾÷¼¼°è¿¡ ÀûÀÀÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ¿© Á¤Ã¼ÀÇ »ó½Ç, °ü°èÀÇ ¿Ö°î, ¼ÒÅëÀÇ ´ÜÀýÀ» °Þ°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀÌ Çѱ¹ ³²¼º¼ºÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡µéÀÌ´Ù. À̸¦ ±Øº¹ÇÏ°í °Åµì³ª±â À§ÇÑ Æò»ý±³À°ÀÇ ³ë·ÂÀÌ Àý½ÇÇѵ¥, º¸»ìÇ˰ú µ¹º½À» Ãß±¸ÇÏ´Â ÀüÀÎÀûÀÎ °øµ¿Ã¼Àû Àç»çȸȸ¦ ±× ´ë¾ÈÀ¸·Î Á¦½ÃÇØ º¸¾Ò´Ù
[´Ý±â]
¿µ¹® ÃÊ·Ï
Today gender is a key concept in most disciplines and political discourses. Gender discourse raises questions not only about the oppression and discrimination of women but about the divers...
[´õº¸±â]
Today gender is a key concept in most disciplines and political discourses. Gender discourse raises questions not only about the oppression and discrimination of women but about the diversity of human relationships through gender relationships. In particular, gendering, which is the socialization process of gender, is above all a matter of education. In the West, educational research on gender discourse has gone beyond feminist educational discourse since the 1990s due to the influence of masculinity studies and gender studies. In Korea, however, even feminist educational discurse is still in its infancy. This paper attempts to provide a future direction for educational research in Korea from a gender perspective incorporating masculinity studies.
Starting with a critique of the dominant masculinity of Korea within political and social contexts, this paper investigates the social and personal relationships as well as self-identity that this has produced. Because of patriarchy based on traditional Confucian ideology and authoritarianism based on military rule, Korean masculinity has been perverted into a destructive male-centered sexualized culture that prevents men from adjusting to new family or occupational structures and causes loss of identity and breakdown of relationships and communication. Educational efforts are essential in order to overcome these problems and become balanced human beings; some alternatives will be considered, such as re-socialization into wholistic communities that pursue caring and nurturing.
[´Ý±â]
¸ñÂ÷
¿ä¾à
¥°. ¿Ö ³²¼º¹®Á¦Àΰ¡? -±³À°´ã·Ð°ú Á¨´õ-
¥±. ³²¼ºÀº ž´Â°¡, ¸¸µé¾îÁö´Â°¡? -³²¼º¼ºÀÇ ±¸Á¶¿Í Çü¼º°úÁ¤-
¥². Çѱ¹ÀÇ ³²¼º¼ºÀº ¾î¶»°Ô ¸¸µé¾îÁö´Â°¡? -°¡ºÎÀåÀû ±Ù´ëÈ ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®¿Í Çѱ¹ ³²¼º¼º-
¥³. Çѱ¹ÀÇ ³²¼º¼ºÀº ¹«¾ùÀ¸·Î »ç´Â°¡? -ÀÏ»óÀÇ ÆÄ½ÃÁòÀû ¾ÆºñÅõ½º Àç»ý»ê-
¥´. Çѱ¹ÀÇ ³²¼ºÇعæÀ» À§ÇÑ ±³À°Àº °¡´ÉÇѰ¡? -¾ç¼ºÆòµî ±³À°°ú ³²¼º¼º-
Âü°í¹®Çå
Abstract