±¹¹® ÃÊ·Ï
ÀÌ ³í¹®Àº àøûÉ ì°ìËÀÇ ¹®ÀÎ Áß Çа迡¼ ÁÖ¸ñ¹ÞÁö ¸øÇß´ø àêèÀ ì°úÜüº(1713~1772)À̶õ ÀÛ°¡¸¦ ¼Ò°³Çϰí, ±×ÀÇ ÀúÀÛ ¡ºàêèÀíÚîÊ¡»¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±×ÀÇ ãÌÖåÀ» ±Ô¸íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌÇöȯÀÇ ÀúÀÛ ¡ºàêèÀíÚîÊ¡»¿¡´Â 18¼¼±â ¹®¿¹»ç¿¡ °üÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ Á¤º¸»Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Ó×ÓÛÀÇ ã̸¦ ¹Ù¶óº¸°í Áø´ÜÇÑ, ÀÛÀÚ ÀÌÇöȯÀÇ ¼±¸íÇÑ ãÌøÄÀÌ ´ã°Ü ÀÖ´Ù. ±×´Â ÀÌ ÀÚ·á¿¡¼ Ó×ÓÛ¸¦ ãÌÔ³°¡ ÀÎ...
[´õº¸±â]
ÀÌ ³í¹®Àº àøûÉ ì°ìËÀÇ ¹®ÀÎ Áß Çа迡¼ ÁÖ¸ñ¹ÞÁö ¸øÇß´ø àêèÀ ì°úÜüº(1713~1772)À̶õ ÀÛ°¡¸¦ ¼Ò°³Çϰí, ±×ÀÇ ÀúÀÛ ¡ºàêèÀíÚîÊ¡»¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±×ÀÇ ãÌÖåÀ» ±Ô¸íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌÇöȯÀÇ ÀúÀÛ ¡ºàêèÀíÚîÊ¡»¿¡´Â 18¼¼±â ¹®¿¹»ç¿¡ °üÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ Á¤º¸»Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Ó×ÓÛÀÇ ã̸¦ ¹Ù¶óº¸°í Áø´ÜÇÑ, ÀÛÀÚ ÀÌÇöȯÀÇ ¼±¸íÇÑ ãÌøÄÀÌ ´ã°Ü ÀÖ´Ù. ±×´Â ÀÌ ÀÚ·á¿¡¼ Ó×ÓÛ¸¦ ãÌÔ³°¡ ÀθêµÈ ½Ã´ë·Î ÀνÄÇϰí, ãÌóÜí°ú ãÌԳȸº¹À» À§ÇÑ Áß¿äÇÑ °ßÇØ¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿ì¼± ½ÃâÀÛÀÇ ±âº» ÀüÁ¦·Î ¡®òØò±¡¯¿Í ¡®Ô¿û¿¡¯¸¦ °Á¶ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×´Â Ô³ùÊÀ̳ª ùÊÙþ ºÐ¾ß¿¡¼ °Á¶ÇÏ¿´´ø òØò±¿Í Ô¿û¿¸¦, ã̺κп¡ Àû¿ë½ÃÄÑ ½ÃâÀÛÀÇ ±âº»ÀüÁ¦·Î ÀÌÇØÇϰí ã̸¦ ±Ã±¸ÇÏ°í ¿¬±¸ÇؾßÇÒ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÀνÄÇß´Ù. »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ïªÊ¾¤ýßöûþ µî ¹®¿¹Àü¹ÝÀÇ Ã¢ÀÛ°ú ÀÌÇØ¸¦ À§ÇÑ ±âº» ÀüÁ¦·Î °£ÁÖÇϱ⵵ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¶ÇÇÑ ãÌÔ³¸¦ ȸº¹ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ °ü°ÇÀ¸·Î ¡ºãÌÌè¡»°ú ¡¸Í¯ãÌä¨ÎúâÏ¡¹¸¦ Áß½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×´Â ƯÁ¤ ÀÛ°¡³ª Çü½ÄÀ» Àü¹üÀ¸·Î »ï¾Æ¼´Â Âü´Ù¿î ½Ã°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁú ¼ö ¾ø´Ù°í »ý°¢Çϰí, ãÌᡤýãÌà¹À̶ó ÀÏÄþîÁö´Â ÔáÜˤýì°ÛÜÁ¶Â÷µµ ±× °¡Ä¡¸¦ ÆïÇÏÇØ¹ö·È´Ù. ÀÌ´Â ¿Ü¸éÀû ±ÔÀ²°ú ÅëÁ¦·ÎºÎÅÍ ÇØ¹æµÇ°í ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ °¨Á¤À» À¯·Î½ÃŲ ¡ºãÌÌè¡»°ú ¡¸Í¯ãÌä¨ÎúâÏ¡¹ÀÇ Á¤½ÅÀ» °è½ÂÇØ¾ß¸¸ ÀθêµÈ ½Ãµµ¸¦ ȸº¹ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
[´Ý±â]
¿µ¹® ÃÊ·Ï
The purpose of this paper is to address Sumwa, Lee Hyun-Hwan(1713~1772) who has not been paid much attention to from the academic world, compared to his fellows under Seongho, Lee Ik and to identify h...
[´õº¸±â]
The purpose of this paper is to address Sumwa, Lee Hyun-Hwan(1713~1772) who has not been paid much attention to from the academic world, compared to his fellows under Seongho, Lee Ik and to identify his poetics by analyzing his book, Sumwazabseo. This book contains important information about the literary and artistic trends in the 18th century and clearly presents his critical viewpoint of poetry and his evaluation of the contemporary poems. He criticized that poems had lost the spirit of poetry and submitted his significant opinion for writing a poem and reinstating that spirit.
What is important is that the author emphasized 'truly knowing' and 'a strong liking' as basic principles of writing a poem. He also believed these attitudes, originally valued in the contemporary academic world and philosophical study, should be applied for poetic study, acknowledging poetry as one of the main object for study. Additionally, he regarded these essential attitudes as the fundamentals to understand and to create literary and art works such as seal engraving, calligraphy and paintings.
More significantly, he put priority on Shijing and Koshishipkusu for reinstating the spirit of poetry. Since he held a belief that a poet could not write a good poem following a particular writer or a style so that he devalued even the great poets like Tu Fu and Lee Bai. This is because he believed the destroyed spirit of poetry could be restored by following the spirit of Shijing and Koshishipkusu which liberated individual emotions from outside rules and control.
[´Ý±â]
¸ñÂ÷
±¹¹®ÃÊ·Ï
1. ¸Ó¸®¸»
2. ¡ºàêèÀíÚîÊ¡»¿Í ãÌøÄ
3. ãÌóÜíÂÀÇ ±âº» ÀüÁ¦ - ¡®òØò±¡¯¿Í ¡®Ô¿û¿¡¯
4. ãÌÔ³ÀÇ È¸º¹ - ¡ºãÌÌè¡»°ú ¡¸Í¯ãÌä¨ÎúâÏ¡¹
5. ¸ÎÀ½¸»
Âü°í¹®Çå
ABSTRACT