±³º¸¹®°í SCHOLAR ½ºÄݶó
ÀÌ ÀÚ·á´Â ±¹°¡Áö½Ä ¿¬°è±â°ü°úÀÇ Çù¾à¿¡ µû¶ó ¹«·á·Î Á¦°øµË´Ï´Ù.
¿ø¹®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇϽñâ À§Çؼ­´Â ¿¬°è±â°üÀÇ Á¤Ã¥À» µû¸£°í ÀÖÀ¸´Ï
±Ã±ÝÇϽŠ»çÇ×Àº ¿¬°è±â°üÀ» ÅëÇØ ¹®ÀÇÇϽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
°ð ¿¬°è±â°üÀ¸·Î À̵¿ÇÕ´Ï´Ù
º»¹®³»¿ë ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
Ȩ > Çѱ¹»ý¼º¹®¹ýÇÐȸ > »ý¼º¹®¹ý¿¬±¸
³í¹® Ç¥Áö

What Do Ellipsis Phenomena Talk about Grammar? First Aux Licensing in English VP Ellipsis

¿ø¹®º¸±â ¿ø¹®ÀúÀå ÀοëÁ¤º¸º¹»ç ±¸¸Å 8,440¿ø

±¹¹® ÃÊ·Ï

* ÇöÀç ÄÁÅÙÃ÷ Á¤º¸¸¦ Áغñ Áß¿¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

¿µ¹® ÃÊ·Ï

This article argues for a simple hypothesis of VPE (VP Ellipsis) licensing in English--VPE is licensed only by the first auxiliary verb in both infinitival and finite clauses. This is made possible in...

[´õº¸±â]

¸ñÂ÷

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Is the contrast between control to and ECM/raising to real with respect to VPE licensing capability?
3. What is the nature of the infinitive to with respect to VPE licensing?
4. Why doesn't the negator not license VPE in infinitival clauses?
5. What is the nonlocal VPE licensing mechanism?
6. Does the sentential not really license VPE in finite clauses?
7. Apparent problems
8. Conclusion
References
ÀúÀÚ¼Ò°³

Ű¿öµå